Saturday, May 23, 2009

A Pro Deal for All Americans

In the outdoor and fitness industries, a "pro deal" is a discount given to employees of outdoor and fitness industry companies. This discount is usually at least 20% off retail, and the best discount I know about is 30% off the wholesale price. The only consumer equivalent would be a warehouse sale, but pro deals are usually in effect all year long. There are even websites set up exclusively to sell discounted merch to industry pros.

The rationale behind the pro deal system has several points. The first reason is promotional, and this is where the pro deal system got its start. Manufacturers want influential people to wear their brands. Who is more influential than those whose job it is to introduce consumers to a new activity? For example, a ski instructor might teach lessons to hundreds of skiers each year. If his eager pupils are impressed with him and his sexy $500 Spyder jacket, they might very well pony up full retail for apparel from Spyder in the future, though the instructor paid far less. This pro deal offers the manufacturer a powerful branding opportunity.

The second reason is charitable. In some industries, the average employee doesn't earn enough to be a customer of that industry. The cycling industry is a great example. Since the average bike shop's profit margin might be as low as 35%, the typical shop rat can't possibly be paid enough to afford a $5,000 bike. Bike shops usually offer an employee purchase program, but many manufacturers of high margin items graciously extend pro deals to their own kind.

The third reasoning is simple gear lust and stinginess. Most people who participate in a gear-intensive activity love them some sexy gear. Most people like paying less than full price. So employees in an industry will offer reciprocal pro deals to other companies just so they don't have to pay full price. In this way, the outdoor and fitness industries are a complicated network of pro deals.

Pro deals have rules. You can only order for yourself. No purchasing for friends or family. Some pro deals have an annual dollar maximum. Most pro deals will only ship to your work address. The most stringent deals require proof of your employment in the industry, like a pay stub, business card, and current catalog. Some pro deals are on a limited selection of products. Most pro deals expire at the end of each calendar year, which causes a flurry of pro deal paperwork early each spring. Industry tradeshows like Interbike and Outdoor Retailer are a flurry of pro deal trading; some companies actually send reps to each booth with the next year's pro deal form or unique login.

There is a certain sense of backalley shame in the pro deal system; people tend to lower their voices when discussing the pro deals available to them. "Pro forms", the special order forms that employees use to fax in or email pro deals, are secured in the back of filing cabinets and passed around surreptitiously. No one wants to risk losing their special pro deal by sharing it with someone who might blow it for them by abusing the deal or ordering too much. If you have a sweet pro deal, you only offer access to those you trust.

But what if everyone had a pro deal?

The Personal Health Investment Today Act of 2009 promises just that. The Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association offers a breakdown of what the "PHIT Bill" might mean. Basically, the PHIT Act would extend the Flexible Spending Account tax break to include some purchases of equipment used in physical activity.

Depending on your tax bracket, that could mean 20-40% off your next TREK bicycle, gym membership, Gregory backpack, gym class or ski lesson, or Garmin GPS-enabled fitness watch. That, my friends, is a pro deal every American should support (though I certainly wouldn't want to have the job of approving or denying purchases or, for that matter, making up the tax revenue shortfall).

The bill's sponsors offer these justifications:

  • 20% of Americans aged 2-19 are overweight or obese.
  • 8 of the 9 most expensive illnesses are more common in overweight people.
  • Between 1981 and 2001, per capita healthcare costs rose 27% because of the increase in the number of overweight Americans.
  • The WHO estimates that, in the U.S., a $1 investment in physical activity would reduce medical expenses by $3.20.
So score yourself a pro deal: ask your representative in the House to sponsor the PHIT bill.

Monday, May 18, 2009

The Bucket List Marathoner

A few days ago, Runner's World "tossed a rhetorical hand grenade" into its Daily Views column, asking "What do you think of folks who run a marathon for the sole reason of crossing it off some sort of 'bucket list'?". A bucket list being a list of things you want to do before you kick the bucket.

The article got over 200 comments and inspired this post today:

"Whew! Is it safe to come out now? Dear readers, before the weekend we sparked a doo-doo deluge when we asked for your thoughts on the "Bucket List Marathon." After more than 200 comments, including accusations of being "insulting," "elitist," and "off our rockers," we're ready to call a cease-fire. Let's all tip-toe away from that little battlefield, and agree that from this point forward, we'll never again mention the word "bucket" unless we need a synonym for a pail of water."

I thought the posted comments were refreshing, particularly the first one: "I've been running for 45 years (7+ miles per day) and I ran my one and only marathon to cross it off my bucket list. You don't have to be a marathon runner to be a runner!" (I've only read one issue of the Runner's World print magazine so far, but I was struck by how the editorial staff seemed to assume that all runners want to run a marathon.)

The reaction to the writer's tone and assumptions in "The 'Bucket List' Marathon" shows that many Runner's World readers are bucket list marathoners. Did the writer overestimate his readership? Should we take his post at face value, that it was a "rhetorical hand grenade". He certainly stirred up quite a conversation.

Saturday, May 16, 2009

How to Buy and Apply Sunblock

The New York Times comments on this summer's impending SPF "arms" race:

"No SPF, not even 100+, offers 100 percent protection. What’s more, both UVA and UVB radiation can lead to skin cancer, which is why dermatologists now advise using sunscreens with an SPF of at least 15 and UVA-fighting ingredients like an avobenzone that doesn’t degrade in light or Mexoryl SX.

The difference in UVB protection between an SPF 100 and SPF 50 is marginal. Far from offering double the blockage, SPF 100 blocks 99 percent of UVB rays, while SPF 50 blocks 98 percent. (SPF 30, that old-timer, holds its own, deflecting 96.7 percent).

A sunscreen’s SPF number is calculated by comparing the time needed for a person to burn unprotected with how long it takes for that person to burn wearing sunscreen. So a person who turns red after 20 minutes of unprotected sun exposure is theoretically protected 15 times longer if they adequately apply SPF 15. Because a lot of sunscreens rub off or don’t stay put, dermatologists advise reapplication every two hours or after swimming or sweating."

"It has long been assumed that applying half the recommended ounce meant half the SPF protection. But a small 2007 study...found that 'If you apply half the amount, you get the protection of only the square root of the SPF.'...So applying a half-ounce of SPF 70 will not give you the protection of SPF 35, but 8.4."

Read the full article here.